<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What if the bad guys win?</title>
	<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/01/24/what-if-the-bad-guys-win/</link>
	<description>Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/01/24/what-if-the-bad-guys-win/#comment-100</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/01/24/what-if-the-bad-guys-win/#comment-100</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the comment :)

The passage I was quoting is just a work of speculative fiction. As of today, DMCA soft of protects the ISP's but who knows what kind of laws are we going to have tomorrow? 

Every day I read about some new proposed law  intended to "stop the piracy" or "protect children online" or both. Better yet, they tend to sneak these things into some of those "must pass" federal spending bills. So I think it is reasonable to assume that one day ISP's and hosting providers might be expected to premptively filter and censor their content to avoid lawsuits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>The passage I was quoting is just a work of speculative fiction. As of today, DMCA soft of protects the ISP&#8217;s but who knows what kind of laws are we going to have tomorrow? </p>
<p>Every day I read about some new proposed law  intended to &#8220;stop the piracy&#8221; or &#8220;protect children online&#8221; or both. Better yet, they tend to sneak these things into some of those &#8220;must pass&#8221; federal spending bills. So I think it is reasonable to assume that one day ISP&#8217;s and hosting providers might be expected to premptively filter and censor their content to avoid lawsuits.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/01/24/what-if-the-bad-guys-win/#comment-99</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/01/24/what-if-the-bad-guys-win/#comment-99</guid>
					<description>Actually, I feel the need to correct one minor issue. WHile I don't know about anti-terror or piracy filters, I know that hosts are not filtering for plagiarism or other copyright infringement. They don't have to. 

The DMCA grants them all immunity from copyright infringement claims so long as they meet certain criteria and work to take infringing material down when they get notice. It was a major win for both hosts and the RIAA, just not the rest of us.

Still though, no filtering is required or going on. Otherwise, I'd probably have a lot fewer incidents of plagiarism to worry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I feel the need to correct one minor issue. WHile I don&#8217;t know about anti-terror or piracy filters, I know that hosts are not filtering for plagiarism or other copyright infringement. They don&#8217;t have to. </p>
<p>The DMCA grants them all immunity from copyright infringement claims so long as they meet certain criteria and work to take infringing material down when they get notice. It was a major win for both hosts and the RIAA, just not the rest of us.</p>
<p>Still though, no filtering is required or going on. Otherwise, I&#8217;d probably have a lot fewer incidents of plagiarism to worry about.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.321 seconds -->
