Comments on: Creationist Pamphlet http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/02/23/creationist-pamphlet/ Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings... Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:49:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 by: Luke http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/02/23/creationist-pamphlet/#comment-1506 Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:47:29 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/02/23/creationist-pamphlet/#comment-1506 Actually there is alot of geological evidence pointing towards a gradual change. Scientists have also observed evolution at work in insects (whose laife span is very short) by observing how isolated groups adapt to their environments via natural selection. Evolution is a scientific fact that has been even acknowledged by the Catholic Church. Vatican's Chief Astronomer <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10101394/" rel="nofollow">has been very vocal opponent of teaching intelligent design in science curriculum</a>. Trying to discredit evolution because it does not agree with an ancient bibilical allegory is a little sily. Actually there is alot of geological evidence pointing towards a gradual change. Scientists have also observed evolution at work in insects (whose laife span is very short) by observing how isolated groups adapt to their environments via natural selection.

Evolution is a scientific fact that has been even acknowledged by the Catholic Church. Vatican’s Chief Astronomer has been very vocal opponent of teaching intelligent design in science curriculum.

Trying to discredit evolution because it does not agree with an ancient bibilical allegory is a little sily.

]]> by: GalaKnight http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/02/23/creationist-pamphlet/#comment-1497 Thu, 09 Nov 2006 13:34:49 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/02/23/creationist-pamphlet/#comment-1497 No offense dude but I see no definitive proof on either side to say that creatism or evolutionism is right or wrong. "The absense of evidence is not the evidence of absence." It's sad to admit on so many levels but that line is true. Scientists make mistakes and so do Religious Zealots, both are still Human and even if you believe in evolution we aren't perfect in the sightest. Both are refered to as theories for the same reason. Sorry but in reality it's a lot easier to disprove one thing turned into another so dramatically (no middle steps between) than to disprove some-one/thing created everything in existance billions of years ago. No offense dude but I see no definitive proof on either side to say that creatism or evolutionism is right or wrong. “The absense of evidence is not the evidence of absence.” It’s sad to admit on so many levels but that line is true. Scientists make mistakes and so do Religious Zealots, both are still Human and even if you believe in evolution we aren’t perfect in the sightest. Both are refered to as theories for the same reason. Sorry but in reality it’s a lot easier to disprove one thing turned into another so dramatically (no middle steps between) than to disprove some-one/thing created everything in existance billions of years ago.

]]> by: Terminally Incoherent » Blog Archive » Anti Environmentalism http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/02/23/creationist-pamphlet/#comment-185 Fri, 19 May 2006 03:22:26 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/02/23/creationist-pamphlet/#comment-185 [...] It’s hard to believe that anyone could take this kind of stuff seriously. But then again, some people think that Banana is an undeniable proof against evolution. So you never know… [...] […] It’s hard to believe that anyone could take this kind of stuff seriously. But then again, some people think that Banana is an undeniable proof against evolution. So you never know… […]

]]>