Creationist Pamphlet
Someone gave this creationist pamphlet (click on the thumb to view) to my brother’s girlfriend on a bus. She found it funny so she kept it to show to my brother. He in turn knew that I will get a kick out of it so he ended up saving it for me.
Of course I immediately scanned the funniest bits it and uploaded it to flickr to share the humor with the world! I find it hilarious! Especially the banana bit. Did you know that bananas proove inteligent design? Check it out:
The bananna–the atheist’s nightmare
Note that the bananna:
- Is shaped for human hand
- Has non-slip surface
- Has outward indicators of inward contents: Green–too early, Yellow–just right, Black–too late.
- Has a tab for removal of wrapper
- Is preforated on wrapper
- Bio-degradable wrapper
- Is shaped for human mouth
- Has a point at top for ease of entry
- Is pleasing t otaste buds
- Is curved towards the face to make easting process easy
To say that the bananna happened by accident is even more unintellingent that to say that no one designed the Coca Cola can.
LOL! Wow.. Where do I begin. What if you hold the bannana wrong? Then it is curved away from your face! Is that a proof against inteligent design?
Has a point on top for the easy of entry? Entry where? I admit, I have a dirty mind by nature, but that just sounds wrong!
Bio-degradable wrapper? Dude, it is a fruit! All fruits are bio degradable!
How about I make a little super biased test in the same way they did on that pamphlet:
- A. Intelligent
- B. A fool
- C. Has an ulterior motive for denying the obvious
I almost feel guilty making fun of this… They just make it so easy!
Related Posts:
May 18th, 2006 at 10:22 pm (185) [Quote]
[…] It’s hard to believe that anyone could take this kind of stuff seriously. But then again, some people think that Banana is an undeniable proof against evolution. So you never know… […]
Posted usingNovember 9th, 2006 at 8:34 am (1497) [Quote]
No offense dude but I see no definitive proof on either side to say that creatism or evolutionism is right or wrong. “The absense of evidence is not the evidence of absence.” It’s sad to admit on so many levels but that line is true. Scientists make mistakes and so do Religious Zealots, both are still Human and even if you believe in evolution we aren’t perfect in the sightest. Both are refered to as theories for the same reason. Sorry but in reality it’s a lot easier to disprove one thing turned into another so dramatically (no middle steps between) than to disprove some-one/thing created everything in existance billions of years ago.
Posted usingNovember 9th, 2006 at 9:47 am (1506) [Quote]
Actually there is alot of geological evidence pointing towards a gradual change. Scientists have also observed evolution at work in insects (whose laife span is very short) by observing how isolated groups adapt to their environments via natural selection.
Evolution is a scientific fact that has been even acknowledged by the Catholic Church. Vatican’s Chief Astronomer has been very vocal opponent of teaching intelligent design in science curriculum.
Trying to discredit evolution because it does not agree with an ancient bibilical allegory is a little sily.
Posted using