Comments on: Top Villain of 2006 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/ Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings... Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:50:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 by: ambush http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2323 Thu, 04 Jan 2007 01:47:54 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2323 gee so bush is a villain for executing a POW with no evidence against him? for starting a war? for being the second worst president of all time? oh and whats up with the war measures act, sounds like a legal version of watergate to me. gee so bush is a villain for executing a POW with no evidence against him? for starting a war? for being the second worst president of all time? oh and whats up with the war measures act, sounds like a legal version of watergate to me.

]]> by: Matt` http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2312 Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:30:57 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2312 ahh, thought there'd be an explanation like that hehe.. weird kind of tag - several line long, no wonder wordpress didnt like it :lol: ahh, thought there’d be an explanation like that
hehe.. weird kind of tag - several line long, no wonder wordpress didnt like it lol

]]> by: Luke http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2310 Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:13:18 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2310 Yep, the "less than" sign is code for "open HTML tag". So the rest of your post was essentially treated as a weird nonstandard tag, with many attributes. Wordpress is set to strip all HTML tags except the ones mentioned above the comment box - so it got killed. Sorry. If you want to show < you need to use the HTML entity: &lt; Yep, the “less than” sign is code for “open HTML tag”. So the rest of your post was essentially treated as a weird nonstandard tag, with many attributes. Wordpress is set to strip all HTML tags except the ones mentioned above the comment box - so it got killed. Sorry.

If you want to show < you need to use the HTML entity: &lt;

]]> by: Matt` http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2306 Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:39:51 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2306 hey... were did the rest of my post go? is "less than sign" "1" "percent sign" some sort of code for "cut my post off here" anyway, either a horde of less-than-one-percent-ers or some un-political high scorers got left off the poll, I wonder who else got voted for Now lets see if it'll show the less-than and percent thingy hey… were did the rest of my post go?
is “less than sign” “1″ “percent sign” some sort of code for “cut my post off here”

anyway, either a horde of less-than-one-percent-ers or some un-political high scorers got left off the poll, I wonder who else got voted for

Now lets see if it’ll show the less-than and percent thingy

]]> by: Matt` http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2305 Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:36:44 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2305 Or a couple of lesser bad guys - you'd have to get almost all the missing votes to beat Bush, maybe they just left out some people who dont make a good political message but were still less than Bush I know I'm splitting hairs but..... :? Ok, I have no reason for splitting hairs except that its another possibility. Whichever way it happened theres people they left out - either a horde of Or a couple of lesser bad guys - you’d have to get almost all the missing votes to beat Bush, maybe they just left out some people who dont make a good political message but were still less than Bush

I know I’m splitting hairs but….. ?
Ok, I have no reason for splitting hairs except that its another possibility.

Whichever way it happened theres people they left out - either a horde of

]]> by: Luke http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2299 Mon, 01 Jan 2007 08:11:00 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2299 Good point. Perhaps Bush is not the highest scoring villain on the poll, but the newscast from which this screenshot was taken only chose to show this sample for obvious political message: "People think Bush is a bigger villain than the top 4 global bad guys and satan combined". :P Good point. Perhaps Bush is not the highest scoring villain on the poll, but the newscast from which this screenshot was taken only chose to show this sample for obvious political message:

“People think Bush is a bigger villain than the top 4 global bad guys and satan combined”.

:P

]]> by: Matt` http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2297 Mon, 01 Jan 2007 03:13:51 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2297 They would have to get less than 1 percent to score lower than satan, 53% left to divide up, so 53+ other people (most likely many more since it seems unlikely that everyone would get <i>just</i> less than one percent I dunno... it seems the only logical answer but I don't think there are that many candidates for villain of the year Unless there were other high scorers and they only showed the results for the politically topical ones (and satan) They would have to get less than 1 percent to score lower than satan, 53% left to divide up, so 53+ other people (most likely many more since it seems unlikely that everyone would get just less than one percent

I dunno… it seems the only logical answer but I don’t think there are that many candidates for villain of the year

Unless there were other high scorers and they only showed the results for the politically topical ones (and satan)

]]> by: Luke http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2291 Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:04:41 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2291 No clue Matt. I guess the rest was irrelevant - most likely a long list of more or less known people who only got fractions of a percent. But then again, who knows... No clue Matt. I guess the rest was irrelevant - most likely a long list of more or less known people who only got fractions of a percent.

But then again, who knows…

]]> by: Matt` http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2290 Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:44:38 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2290 So where did the other 53% of the votes go? So where did the other 53% of the votes go?

]]> by: Wikke http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2288 Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:50:26 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/12/30/top-villain-of-2006/#comment-2288 You have to give Saddam some credit. He managed to keep his trial in his own hands with his comments. He wanted to make hisory, he did it! You have to give Saddam some credit.
He managed to keep his trial in his own hands with his comments.
He wanted to make hisory, he did it!

]]>