<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ackermann Function in Java</title>
	<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/03/15/ackermann-function-in-java/</link>
	<description>Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/03/15/ackermann-function-in-java/#comment-4214</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/03/15/ackermann-function-in-java/#comment-4214</guid>
					<description>Yup, that's what it seems like. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, that&#8217;s what it seems like. Thanks.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/03/15/ackermann-function-in-java/#comment-4213</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/03/15/ackermann-function-in-java/#comment-4213</guid>
					<description>if you try to work the function out on paper the value "m" variable is so much more important than the value of "n" variable that A(4,1) is not that different from A(4,2) at all! a huge number of "n"'s must be needed to equal just one "m"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you try to work the function out on paper the value &#8220;m&#8221; variable is so much more important than the value of &#8220;n&#8221; variable that A(4,1) is not that different from A(4,2) at all! a huge number of &#8220;n&#8221;&#8217;s must be needed to equal just one &#8220;m&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.070 seconds -->
