Comments on: PerfMonG - Minimalistic Performance Monitor for Windows http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/ Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings... Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:52:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 by: Terminally Incoherent » Blog Archive » PerfMonG 0.2.5 Released http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4945 Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:20:37 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4945 [...] If you are to lazy to click any links, and you have no clue what I’m talking about, let me explain. PerfMonG is my small open source project - a minimalistic performance monitor for windows written in .NET. I mentioned it once before. If you are a windows user, or a .NET programmer definitely check it out, and contribute if you can. tags: PerfMonG, performance monitor, cpu monitor, google code, perfmong 0.2.5 [...] […] If you are to lazy to click any links, and you have no clue what I’m talking about, let me explain. PerfMonG is my small open source project - a minimalistic performance monitor for windows written in .NET. I mentioned it once before. If you are a windows user, or a .NET programmer definitely check it out, and contribute if you can. tags: PerfMonG, performance monitor, cpu monitor, google code, perfmong 0.2.5 […]

]]> by: Luke http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4927 Sat, 23 Jun 2007 06:22:00 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4927 Just a heads up - I added the editable CPU tresholds (Issue 2) in the 0.2.5 release candidate. So if you want the freshest code, please check out from: http://perfmong.googlecode.com/svn/branches/release_0.2.5_candidate/ rather than from trunk. I haven't had a chance to test it throughly so that's why the code is in the branch. I will probably merge it to trunk over the weekend. But for now, work of the branch - it will be easier to merge all these things later. :) Just a heads up - I added the editable CPU tresholds (Issue 2) in the 0.2.5 release candidate. So if you want the freshest code, please check out from:

http://perfmong.googlecode.com/svn/branches/release_0.2.5_candidate/

rather than from trunk. I haven’t had a chance to test it throughly so that’s why the code is in the branch. I will probably merge it to trunk over the weekend. But for now, work of the branch - it will be easier to merge all these things later. )

]]> by: Luke http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4926 Sat, 23 Jun 2007 01:02:02 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4926 Awesome. I applied the patch and chucked it into the repository as release_0.2.5_candidate branch. I'll merge it with HEAD and roll a release bit later. If you get the dual CPU stuff working, I will include it also and just increment the major version to 0.3.0. :) Awesome. I applied the patch and chucked it into the repository as release_0.2.5_candidate branch. I’ll merge it with HEAD and roll a release bit later.

If you get the dual CPU stuff working, I will include it also and just increment the major version to 0.3.0. )

]]> by: Mike http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4925 Fri, 22 Jun 2007 23:34:06 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4925 i do have a couple dual cpu machines. ill look into it. If you look at a win task mgr on a dual cpu box you will see that the cpu usage is a single percentage (same thing that you have) however they do provide two graphs for it on a dual cpu machine. So there must be something else that is monitoring each separately. ill investigate it sometime this week if im not too busy and let you know my findings. thanks, mcm i do have a couple dual cpu machines. ill look into it. If you look at a win task mgr on a dual cpu box you will see that the cpu usage is a single percentage (same thing that you have) however they do provide two graphs for it on a dual cpu machine. So there must be something else that is monitoring each separately.

ill investigate it sometime this week if im not too busy and let you know my findings.

thanks,
mcm

]]> by: Luke http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4924 Fri, 22 Jun 2007 23:24:42 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4924 Actually, it doesn't have a reply button - just a text field on the bottom. If you click on it, it opens up with more options and additional text fields. It's the same concept like replies in Gmail. It's kinda funky, but it works. Btw, I don't think I ever even considered doing dual screen, or dual CPU monitoring when I started writing this app. I added dual CPU monitoring as a feature request. I don't have a dual CPU machine to test it on, but if you do, and you can implement it then it would be awesome. :) Actually, it doesn’t have a reply button - just a text field on the bottom. If you click on it, it opens up with more options and additional text fields. It’s the same concept like replies in Gmail.

It’s kinda funky, but it works.

Btw, I don’t think I ever even considered doing dual screen, or dual CPU monitoring when I started writing this app.

I added dual CPU monitoring as a feature request. I don’t have a dual CPU machine to test it on, but if you do, and you can implement it then it would be awesome. )

]]> by: Mike http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4923 Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:24:42 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4923 No problem about the help. As i said in my earlier post, i was bored at work and messing around with side projects only helps me stay slightly sharper than dull. In future i will add patches as replies, i didn't even see the add comment link on there. i wonder if we can do dual cpu monitoring....;) No problem about the help. As i said in my earlier post, i was bored at work and messing around with side projects only helps me stay slightly sharper than dull.

In future i will add patches as replies, i didn’t even see the add comment link on there.

i wonder if we can do dual cpu monitoring….;)

]]> by: Luke http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4922 Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:08:48 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4922 Dude! You rule! I will test it tonight. Btw, you could have submitted the patch as a "reply" to issue #5. Also, when you create an issue, if you put <em>maciakl</em> in the CC or the Owner field, I will get shot an instant email about it. :) I really appreciate all this help. :mrgreen: Dude! You rule!

I will test it tonight.

Btw, you could have submitted the patch as a “reply” to issue #5. Also, when you create an issue, if you put maciakl in the CC or the Owner field, I will get shot an instant email about it. )

I really appreciate all this help. mrgreen

]]> by: Mike http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4921 Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:36:23 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4921 Hi Luke, Well its friday. I should be working but instead i submitted another issue with the PerfMonG app and then submitted a patch that will fix it. That killed 30 minutes. 1.5 hours to go :( mcm Hi Luke,

Well its friday. I should be working but instead i submitted another issue with the PerfMonG app and then submitted a patch that will fix it. That killed 30 minutes. 1.5 hours to go (

mcm

]]> by: Luke http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4737 Sat, 09 Jun 2007 05:23:17 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4737 Awesome! I credited you on the front page, and uploaded the patch you submitted. I really appreciate all the help. I can't tell you how awesome it is to find out that my old, half-forgotten little project actually got a second wind, and is now in active development (well, sort of). :) Awesome! I credited you on the front page, and uploaded the patch you submitted. I really appreciate all the help.

I can’t tell you how awesome it is to find out that my old, half-forgotten little project actually got a second wind, and is now in active development (well, sort of). )

]]> by: Mike http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4734 Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:15:55 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/04/perfmong-minimalistic-performance-monitor-for-windows/#comment-4734 werid, my post was cut off Credits : mcmcom (www.mustcodemore.com) i have tortoisesvn and will do the patch stuff via that. i will also try to remove the write config button and incorporate it into the apply button to fix the outstanding issue over the weekend. thanks, mcm werid, my post was cut off

Credits :
mcmcom (www.mustcodemore.com)
i have tortoisesvn and will do the patch stuff via that.
i will also try to remove the write config button and incorporate it into the apply button to fix the outstanding issue over the weekend.

thanks,
mcm

]]>