<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did you know that most scientists do not read papers they cite?</title>
	<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/15/did-you-know-that-most-scientists-do-not-read-papers-they-cite/</link>
	<description>Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ZeWrestler</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/15/did-you-know-that-most-scientists-do-not-read-papers-they-cite/#comment-4841</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/15/did-you-know-that-most-scientists-do-not-read-papers-they-cite/#comment-4841</guid>
					<description>This happened to me too.  The ITiCSE paper I wrote a while back, I found a carnige melon paper that cited me as two different people within the same citation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This happened to me too.  The ITiCSE paper I wrote a while back, I found a carnige melon paper that cited me as two different people within the same citation.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/15/did-you-know-that-most-scientists-do-not-read-papers-they-cite/#comment-4800</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 20:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/15/did-you-know-that-most-scientists-do-not-read-papers-they-cite/#comment-4800</guid>
					<description>Yep, exactly. That's because the other paper already has all the bibliographical info you need - so you don't need to look for the journal name, issue, page numbers and all that stuff if someone else already did the legwork. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, exactly. That&#8217;s because the other paper already has all the bibliographical info you need - so you don&#8217;t need to look for the journal name, issue, page numbers and all that stuff if someone else already did the legwork. <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: astropixie</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/15/did-you-know-that-most-scientists-do-not-read-papers-they-cite/#comment-4799</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/06/15/did-you-know-that-most-scientists-do-not-read-papers-they-cite/#comment-4799</guid>
					<description>its also possible that one reads the original paper, but copies the citation from another paper.   i've done this several times (and have hopefully not propagated any citation errors!!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its also possible that one reads the original paper, but copies the citation from another paper.   i&#8217;ve done this several times (and have hopefully not propagated any citation errors!!).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.562 seconds -->
