<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office 2007 is a Disaster</title>
	<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/</link>
	<description>Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Josh Mackie</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-10498</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-10498</guid>
					<description>There is no option for running Office 2007 programs in the classic mode that people are used to, right? Why should producivity be suddenly compromised, by such a dramatic revamp, if not for the sake of software sales?  

If this is a sign of things to come, why not move to Linux?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no option for running Office 2007 programs in the classic mode that people are used to, right? Why should producivity be suddenly compromised, by such a dramatic revamp, if not for the sake of software sales?  </p>
<p>If this is a sign of things to come, why not move to Linux?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-8444</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-8444</guid>
					<description>I tried it for 5 minutes and hated it. I am lost without the traditional menu bar in a GUI application.

If this is such a great idea, why is Apple not rushing to copy it? I am relieved to hear the corporate world is shunning it.

On the other hand, I know someone who I expected to dislike Office 2007. I was amazed when she said she had already tried it out and had taken it up. She was keen to learn all the new way of working. Extraordinary. So I made sure she knew how to set the Word 2007 option to always save in Word 97-2003 format by default, so as to not annoy everyone else, and left it at that.

I think Office 2007 is an example of the danger of usability labs. The trouble with usability labs is that people try to be nice. Remember, in tests at Microsoft, &lt;em&gt;everybody&lt;/em&gt; surveyed said Clippy the paperclip was "a nice thing to have".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried it for 5 minutes and hated it. I am lost without the traditional menu bar in a GUI application.</p>
<p>If this is such a great idea, why is Apple not rushing to copy it? I am relieved to hear the corporate world is shunning it.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I know someone who I expected to dislike Office 2007. I was amazed when she said she had already tried it out and had taken it up. She was keen to learn all the new way of working. Extraordinary. So I made sure she knew how to set the Word 2007 option to always save in Word 97-2003 format by default, so as to not annoy everyone else, and left it at that.</p>
<p>I think Office 2007 is an example of the danger of usability labs. The trouble with usability labs is that people try to be nice. Remember, in tests at Microsoft, <em>everybody</em> surveyed said Clippy the paperclip was &#8220;a nice thing to have&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke Maciak</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-6232</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-6232</guid>
					<description>Oh man. You guys probably have it the worst. Talk about early adopters. :) My company is still mostly Office 2003 and I intend to keep it that way as long as I can. :)

And very true about the reasons behind the redesign. I can just imagine this meeting:

Some director is ecstatically explaining the UI. Suddenly, a young low ranking executive interjects by asking: "But won't the users be upset by this change?"

The room gets quiet and everyone stares at the young guy with a confused look on their face. "Whow gets what now?".

"The users... Our customers. The people we are making this software for." 

Unblinking, confused stare continues. Steve Ballmer gets nervous and throws a chair at someone not really knowing what to make of it. Bill Gates stops counting money for a second, but then resumes. 

The director starts up his spiel about the new UI as if nothing happened.

The meeting continues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man. You guys probably have it the worst. Talk about early adopters. <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" />  My company is still mostly Office 2003 and I intend to keep it that way as long as I can. <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>And very true about the reasons behind the redesign. I can just imagine this meeting:</p>
<p>Some director is ecstatically explaining the UI. Suddenly, a young low ranking executive interjects by asking: &#8220;But won&#8217;t the users be upset by this change?&#8221;</p>
<p>The room gets quiet and everyone stares at the young guy with a confused look on their face. &#8220;Whow gets what now?&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;The users&#8230; Our customers. The people we are making this software for.&#8221; </p>
<p>Unblinking, confused stare continues. Steve Ballmer gets nervous and throws a chair at someone not really knowing what to make of it. Bill Gates stops counting money for a second, but then resumes. </p>
<p>The director starts up his spiel about the new UI as if nothing happened.</p>
<p>The meeting continues.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Office 2007 UI Hater</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-6229</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-6229</guid>
					<description>Oh, I definitely agree with you it is a DISASTER. I can't find out how to do anything anymore, I am back to being a ROOKIE from being a superuser for 12 years. 

I have been fighting on how to create a SIMPLE graphic out of a table for a couple of hours now, and can't get the horizontal series to show correctly. This after trying to fix my simple report that worked on Access, and is broken now. Help does not help either...........

Maybe I have a problem: all this supposedly "intuitive" interface does not work for someone in the late 30's like me. Maybe I am just plain dumb, although I redid my IQ test and it confirmed I am still at 140 (a good one if you ask me) but I feel like I am at 80 and needing special care when dealing with the new UI.

All that I was trying to do was trivial in Office 2003 and before. I guess I will just have to reinstall my previous Office versions. 

And BTW, I work for Microsoft. This might come as a shocker. This post is my venting, I don't care anymore. 

Oh, HOW I HATE THIS NEW UI!

And as for your question on "why fucking fix it if it aín't broke", there is a Pink Floyd called "Have a Cigar" that has the answer: "And did we tell you the name of the game, boy, we call it riding the Gravy Train".....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I definitely agree with you it is a DISASTER. I can&#8217;t find out how to do anything anymore, I am back to being a ROOKIE from being a superuser for 12 years. </p>
<p>I have been fighting on how to create a SIMPLE graphic out of a table for a couple of hours now, and can&#8217;t get the horizontal series to show correctly. This after trying to fix my simple report that worked on Access, and is broken now. Help does not help either&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Maybe I have a problem: all this supposedly &#8220;intuitive&#8221; interface does not work for someone in the late 30&#8217;s like me. Maybe I am just plain dumb, although I redid my IQ test and it confirmed I am still at 140 (a good one if you ask me) but I feel like I am at 80 and needing special care when dealing with the new UI.</p>
<p>All that I was trying to do was trivial in Office 2003 and before. I guess I will just have to reinstall my previous Office versions. </p>
<p>And BTW, I work for Microsoft. This might come as a shocker. This post is my venting, I don&#8217;t care anymore. </p>
<p>Oh, HOW I HATE THIS NEW UI!</p>
<p>And as for your question on &#8220;why fucking fix it if it aín&#8217;t broke&#8221;, there is a Pink Floyd called &#8220;Have a Cigar&#8221; that has the answer: &#8220;And did we tell you the name of the game, boy, we call it riding the Gravy Train&#8221;&#8230;..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-5253</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-5253</guid>
					<description>Actually, all our Office software is OEM installations that were purchased along with the equipment. This is how they were doing it before from the begging. When I started working here we had maybe 40 employees, some of whom worked from home using their own hardware and softwar. Now we have 60-70 and we keep growing. 

So switching to volume licensing is one of my long term plans. Still have to convince the mgmt that this is the right way to go, and write up some estimates to show that we either save money or increase productivity, or whatnot. Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, all our Office software is OEM installations that were purchased along with the equipment. This is how they were doing it before from the begging. When I started working here we had maybe 40 employees, some of whom worked from home using their own hardware and softwar. Now we have 60-70 and we keep growing. </p>
<p>So switching to volume licensing is one of my long term plans. Still have to convince the mgmt that this is the right way to go, and write up some estimates to show that we either save money or increase productivity, or whatnot. Sigh.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-5252</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-5252</guid>
					<description>Luke, one thing to look into before buying Office 2K3 for your users is that if your using MS Open Licensing you can "downgrade" your 2k7 licenses to 2k3 and then re-upgrade them if you ever have a need for 2K7.  I recently had to do this with Project and Visio because i couldn't purchaes 2K3 Licenses from our supplier.  We just purchased 2K7 licenses and downgraded them.  

maybe it can save you some $$$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke, one thing to look into before buying Office 2K3 for your users is that if your using MS Open Licensing you can &#8220;downgrade&#8221; your 2k7 licenses to 2k3 and then re-upgrade them if you ever have a need for 2K7.  I recently had to do this with Project and Visio because i couldn&#8217;t purchaes 2K3 Licenses from our supplier.  We just purchased 2K7 licenses and downgraded them.  </p>
<p>maybe it can save you some $$$.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-5249</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-5249</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;vacri&lt;/strong&gt; - I'm not even sure how dynamic or contextual they are. I haven't really played with it enough to discover that. The point is that they removed the menu bar, and replaced it with a tabbed cluttered interface. Some options are now on the ribbon and some are deeply hidden under the Start Menu like Office Button.

The point is that every time you are trying to do something, you have to go "oh man, where did they put that function now?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>vacri</strong> - I&#8217;m not even sure how dynamic or contextual they are. I haven&#8217;t really played with it enough to discover that. The point is that they removed the menu bar, and replaced it with a tabbed cluttered interface. Some options are now on the ribbon and some are deeply hidden under the Start Menu like Office Button.</p>
<p>The point is that every time you are trying to do something, you have to go &#8220;oh man, where did they put that function now?&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: vacri</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-5248</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-5248</guid>
					<description>I haven't seen it in the flesh. Is it just dynamic/contextual toolbars, or is it something a bit more cunning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen it in the flesh. Is it just dynamic/contextual toolbars, or is it something a bit more cunning?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-5240</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-5240</guid>
					<description>Oh crap. Can't you export the Outlook emails in a format that's accessible to earlier versions of office? I think i have done that before... I'm not sure.

God, I hate Microsoft so much right now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh crap. Can&#8217;t you export the Outlook emails in a format that&#8217;s accessible to earlier versions of office? I think i have done that before&#8230; I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
<p>God, I hate Microsoft so much right now&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Craig Betts</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-5238</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/13/office-2007-is-a-disaster/#comment-5238</guid>
					<description>Heh . . . been reading Slashdot?

http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/14/2229250</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh . . . been reading Slashdot?</p>
<p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/14/2229250" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/14/2229250</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.549 seconds -->
