<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Have I Learned From My Hard Drive Failure</title>
	<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/</link>
	<description>Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5701</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5701</guid>
					<description>Oh man! It sucks. I commented back with some tips. 

Knoppix saves lives. Not an alternative to a good backup strategy mind you, but hell of a life line to have. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man! It sucks. I commented back with some tips. </p>
<p>Knoppix saves lives. Not an alternative to a good backup strategy mind you, but hell of a life line to have. <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Travis McCrea</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5697</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5697</guid>
					<description>I wish i learned from you... 
see my blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish i learned from you&#8230;<br />
see my blog
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt`</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5696</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5696</guid>
					<description>My "backup policy" is essentially just to have a copy of anything important in several places - coursework from school was on the school servers, my laptop and a thumb drive, updated whenever possible, most of the contents of My Documents is mirrored between the PC and the laptop, updated whenever I have anything important enough to warrant it.

In the event of a crash of either machine all I lose is a ton of legitimately acquired *cough* videos that I don't have the space or inclination to keep 2 copies of (and the stuff I haven't watched yet is normally on both anyway, so I don't have to worry about transferring it when I want to watch it)

It's probably not the best way, but I'm lazy, I don't have yet the fear instilled by experience of a fatal hard drive crash (just a few buggered Windows installations, and they gave me time to evacuate data) and hard drive space enough to backup everything is kinda expensive - I would want to be storing something new on it to justify the cost</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My &#8220;backup policy&#8221; is essentially just to have a copy of anything important in several places - coursework from school was on the school servers, my laptop and a thumb drive, updated whenever possible, most of the contents of My Documents is mirrored between the PC and the laptop, updated whenever I have anything important enough to warrant it.</p>
<p>In the event of a crash of either machine all I lose is a ton of legitimately acquired *cough* videos that I don&#8217;t have the space or inclination to keep 2 copies of (and the stuff I haven&#8217;t watched yet is normally on both anyway, so I don&#8217;t have to worry about transferring it when I want to watch it)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably not the best way, but I&#8217;m lazy, I don&#8217;t have yet the fear instilled by experience of a fatal hard drive crash (just a few buggered Windows installations, and they gave me time to evacuate data) and hard drive space enough to backup everything is kinda expensive - I would want to be storing something new on it to justify the cost
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5467</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 02:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5467</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fr3d&lt;/strong&gt; - how about Hitachi Ultrastar series - 15K RPM! LOL

I feel kinda inadequate with my 7200 RPM drives right here. Sigh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fr3d</strong> - how about Hitachi Ultrastar series - 15K RPM! LOL</p>
<p>I feel kinda inadequate with my 7200 RPM drives right here. Sigh&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: vacri</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5466</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5466</guid>
					<description>From what I've heard, you'd use RAID0 for the express purpose of increasing speed for temporary data - things like squid cache, where you don't need data reliability, but getting data fast is very important. I've also heard the same thing of the reiser4 filesystem...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve heard, you&#8217;d use RAID0 for the express purpose of increasing speed for temporary data - things like squid cache, where you don&#8217;t need data reliability, but getting data fast is very important. I&#8217;ve also heard the same thing of the reiser4 filesystem&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fr3d</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5446</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5446</guid>
					<description>[quote post="1763"]Of course in my mind Fault Tolerance &#62; Speed but I can see how that may not always be the case.[/quote]
Indeed - If you want real speed you'd buy a Western Digital Raptor (or Raptor X) and then use RAID 1 ;)

It has it's ups and downs :p

There are some bits that I really like, such as the search in the start menu, which makes it much faster to find a program. The mobility center for laptops is pretty good too.

However both my installations (PC and Laptop) have worse driver installation procedures than Windows 95... But I think that's something to do with the ISO, since it's the same problem on two completely different machines. I did manage to &lt;a href="http://www.fr3d.org/2007/03/failure-of-automatic-installation-of-usb-device-drivers-on-vista/" rel="nofollow"&gt;fix it&lt;/a&gt; once, but it soon broke again and I haven't managed to mend it again.

Bottom line, once you get used to it, and get it configured how you like it, it's not that bad :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/"><p>
Of course in my mind Fault Tolerance &gt; Speed but I can see how that may not always be the case.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Indeed - If you want real speed you&#8217;d buy a Western Digital Raptor (or Raptor X) and then use RAID 1 <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>It has it&#8217;s ups and downs :p</p>
<p>There are some bits that I really like, such as the search in the start menu, which makes it much faster to find a program. The mobility center for laptops is pretty good too.</p>
<p>However both my installations (PC and Laptop) have worse driver installation procedures than Windows 95&#8230; But I think that&#8217;s something to do with the ISO, since it&#8217;s the same problem on two completely different machines. I did manage to <a href="http://www.fr3d.org/2007/03/failure-of-automatic-installation-of-usb-device-drivers-on-vista/" rel="nofollow">fix it</a> once, but it soon broke again and I haven&#8217;t managed to mend it again.</p>
<p>Bottom line, once you get used to it, and get it configured how you like it, it&#8217;s not that bad <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5444</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5444</guid>
					<description>Ah, ok. That kinda makes sense. Of course in my mind Fault Tolerance &#62; Speed but I can see how that may not always be the case.

Btw, I see you're on Vista now. Are you loving it or are you hating it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, ok. That kinda makes sense. Of course in my mind Fault Tolerance &gt; Speed but I can see how that may not always be the case.</p>
<p>Btw, I see you&#8217;re on Vista now. Are you loving it or are you hating it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fr3d</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5442</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5442</guid>
					<description>[quote post="1763"]Is RAID 5 that much slower though? I always figured that if you are RAID’ing anyway, you might as well have some built in fault tolerance.[/quote]
It's slower for writing (the same speed as one single drive) but it's (usually) much faster for reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/"><p>
Is RAID 5 that much slower though? I always figured that if you are RAID’ing anyway, you might as well have some built in fault tolerance.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s slower for writing (the same speed as one single drive) but it&#8217;s (usually) much faster for reading.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5438</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5438</guid>
					<description>[quote comment="5433"]RAID 0 is good for very fast storage of non-important stuff, such as games.[/quote]

Is RAID 5 that much slower though? I always figured that if you are RAID'ing anyway, you might as well have some built in fault tolerance.

[quote comment="5434"]... Yeah i remember windows not booting up because it didn't have firefox ;)[/quote]

LOL. Actually, windows is pretty much self contained, so there is not many applications that can be considered crucial from the OS functionality. I mean crucial for me being able to work on the machine without getting pissed off. I can't browse the web with IE6 - it just can't be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="padding-left: 10px;"><strong>Fr3d</strong> said:</span></p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5433"><p>
RAID 0 is good for very fast storage of non-important stuff, such as games.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Is RAID 5 that much slower though? I always figured that if you are RAID&#8217;ing anyway, you might as well have some built in fault tolerance.</p>
<p><span style="padding-left: 10px;"><strong>Travis McCrea</strong> said:</span></p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5434"><p>
&#8230; Yeah i remember windows not booting up because it didn&#8217;t have firefox <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
</blockquote>
<p>LOL. Actually, windows is pretty much self contained, so there is not many applications that can be considered crucial from the OS functionality. I mean crucial for me being able to work on the machine without getting pissed off. I can&#8217;t browse the web with IE6 - it just can&#8217;t be done.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Travis McCrea</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5434</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/07/25/what-have-i-learned-from-my-hard-drive-failure/#comment-5434</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;crucial applications such as Firefox.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

... Yeah i remember windows not booting up because it didn't have firefox ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>crucial applications such as Firefox.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>&#8230; Yeah i remember windows not booting up because it didn&#8217;t have firefox <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 8.886 seconds -->
