Comments on: Use the 40 Most Common Unix Utilities under Windows http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/08/06/use-the-40-most-common-unix-utilities-under-windows/ Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings... Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:16:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 by: Luke http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/08/06/use-the-40-most-common-unix-utilities-under-windows/#comment-5637 Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:49:41 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/08/06/use-the-40-most-common-unix-utilities-under-windows/#comment-5637 Interesting project. Although Cygwin already kinda does that. It gives you a fully functional POSIX environment, so you can actually compile most linux packages on it. Once I actually set up full KDE on top of Cygwin. It was slow, but functional. :P Interesting project. Although Cygwin already kinda does that. It gives you a fully functional POSIX environment, so you can actually compile most linux packages on it.

Once I actually set up full KDE on top of Cygwin. It was slow, but functional. P

]]> by: Matt` http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/08/06/use-the-40-most-common-unix-utilities-under-windows/#comment-5634 Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:14:01 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/08/06/use-the-40-most-common-unix-utilities-under-windows/#comment-5634 oops, forgot the link - http://openlina.com/index.html oops, forgot the link - http://openlina.com/index.html

]]> by: Matt` http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/08/06/use-the-40-most-common-unix-utilities-under-windows/#comment-5633 Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:13:23 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/08/06/use-the-40-most-common-unix-utilities-under-windows/#comment-5633 There was a program I found the website of via stumbleupon looking like a kind of reverso-WINE, called LINA (LINA Is Not an Acronym), looks like it requires some kind of re-packaging of linux binaries into .lina files (although it says they're just in a zip archive, so nothing too fancy, and through some technical wizardry they make it work in Windows, Mac OS or Unix Aside from the fact that most open source projects release for all the OSs they can port to, this could be useful for any linux-only applications There was a program I found the website of via stumbleupon looking like a kind of reverso-WINE, called LINA (LINA Is Not an Acronym), looks like it requires some kind of re-packaging of linux binaries into .lina files (although it says they’re just in a zip archive, so nothing too fancy, and through some technical wizardry they make it work in Windows, Mac OS or Unix

Aside from the fact that most open source projects release for all the OSs they can port to, this could be useful for any linux-only applications

]]> by: Craig Betts http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/08/06/use-the-40-most-common-unix-utilities-under-windows/#comment-5554 Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:25:22 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/08/06/use-the-40-most-common-unix-utilities-under-windows/#comment-5554 [quote post="1813"]Now that I think about it… Didn’t Sun release something like that also?[/quote] Think opposite. Sun had PC NetLink, which provided Windows NT 4.0 domain services for Solaris. It had a native net commands with all the same flags/options as the Windows version. I used to use this over Samba until AD came out. I keep hoping Sun will continue with an up-to-date version, but I won't hold my breath. Samba 4.0? Maybe . . .

Now that I think about it… Didn’t Sun release something like that also?

Think opposite. Sun had PC NetLink, which provided Windows NT 4.0 domain services for Solaris. It had a native net commands with all the same flags/options as the Windows version. I used to use this over Samba until AD came out. I keep hoping Sun will continue with an up-to-date version, but I won’t hold my breath. Samba 4.0? Maybe . . .

]]> by: Luke http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/08/06/use-the-40-most-common-unix-utilities-under-windows/#comment-5553 Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:14:08 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/08/06/use-the-40-most-common-unix-utilities-under-windows/#comment-5553 Oh yeah! I forgot about these. I think that SFU actually might have more tools. Now that I think about it... Didn't Sun release something like that also? Oh yeah! I forgot about these. I think that SFU actually might have more tools.

Now that I think about it… Didn’t Sun release something like that also?

]]> by: Craig Betts http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/08/06/use-the-40-most-common-unix-utilities-under-windows/#comment-5552 Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:00:34 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/08/06/use-the-40-most-common-unix-utilities-under-windows/#comment-5552 Microsoft Services for UNIX has these ass well. I have used SFU for some thanks to the mix of systems I have at work. Microsoft Services for UNIX has these ass well. I have used SFU for some thanks to the mix of systems I have at work.

]]>