<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Dark Text on Light Background the Superior Choice?</title>
	<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/</link>
	<description>Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Matt`</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6530</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6530</guid>
					<description>I wasn't saying that busier is better, quite the opposite - clean and understated FTW  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t saying that busier is better, quite the opposite - clean and understated FTW  <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke Maciak</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6507</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6507</guid>
					<description>Heh, it's funny that both me and Shamus Young of 20-sided decided to &lt;a href="http://www.shamusyoung.com/twentysidedtale/?p=1360" rel="nofollow"&gt;post on this topic&lt;/a&gt; on the same day.

&lt;strong&gt;@Matt`&lt;/strong&gt; - I think you are right. Black does look busier - but that's not always a good thing. For some reason I prefer websites that look open and spacious rather than busy and crowded.

&lt;strong&gt;@Craig&lt;/strong&gt; - I don't really like light on dark. I can deal with it on a terminal though, and even read an occasional manpage this way but for longer reading or edition I'd rather use light background with white text.

&lt;strong&gt;@polarizer&lt;/strong&gt; - I noticed that most of the artsy pages are done light on dark. Then again, I'm not a very artsy person.

Someone said somewhere that light on dark is very good for emphasizing text - for example using light on dark boxes in a dark on light setting makes them stand out and catch attention.

&lt;strong&gt;@Chrissy&lt;/strong&gt; - hey, nice page. You are right, most pictures do stand out more on dark background. Then again most picture sites (flicker, fotki, photobucket) use dark on light scheme so go figure...

&lt;strong&gt;@vacri&lt;/strong&gt; - heh, funny you mention that. In my office, we have exactly 3 CRT cubes. And 2 of them actually came with the windows servers, and are off except for the rare times when I need to fiddle with the server manually. Everyone else has an LCD or two on their desks. So Blackle would not save us much money here. :mrgreen:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, it&#8217;s funny that both me and Shamus Young of 20-sided decided to <a href="http://www.shamusyoung.com/twentysidedtale/?p=1360" rel="nofollow">post on this topic</a> on the same day.</p>
<p><strong>@Matt`</strong> - I think you are right. Black does look busier - but that&#8217;s not always a good thing. For some reason I prefer websites that look open and spacious rather than busy and crowded.</p>
<p><strong>@Craig</strong> - I don&#8217;t really like light on dark. I can deal with it on a terminal though, and even read an occasional manpage this way but for longer reading or edition I&#8217;d rather use light background with white text.</p>
<p><strong>@polarizer</strong> - I noticed that most of the artsy pages are done light on dark. Then again, I&#8217;m not a very artsy person.</p>
<p>Someone said somewhere that light on dark is very good for emphasizing text - for example using light on dark boxes in a dark on light setting makes them stand out and catch attention.</p>
<p><strong>@Chrissy</strong> - hey, nice page. You are right, most pictures do stand out more on dark background. Then again most picture sites (flicker, fotki, photobucket) use dark on light scheme so go figure&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>@vacri</strong> - heh, funny you mention that. In my office, we have exactly 3 CRT cubes. And 2 of them actually came with the windows servers, and are off except for the rare times when I need to fiddle with the server manually. Everyone else has an LCD or two on their desks. So Blackle would not save us much money here.  <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif" alt="mrgreen" class="wp-smiley" />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: vacri</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6498</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6498</guid>
					<description>I find for smaller fonts I prefer dark on light, and for larger fonts  (like a text console) I prefer light on dark. With small fonts, I find they're clearer as dark on light, and larger fonts are readable either way, but a dark background = less glare. Likewise, if I'm reading dark-on-light as small fonts, I prefer the background of the non-text areas to be muted to reduce glare, a bit like the grey sidebars of this page.

Interestingly, the folks at &lt;a href="http://www.blackle.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Blackle&lt;/a&gt; have got themselves a curious idea, but it's going to fail. The idea being that it takes more energy to paint white than black on monitors, so if everyone can be convinced to use Google with a black theme, then monitors left on google will use less energy. They quote some research somewhere that shows that across millions of users, the savings are not trivial, but unfortunately what may have been true in the CRT world is patently not true in the LCD world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find for smaller fonts I prefer dark on light, and for larger fonts  (like a text console) I prefer light on dark. With small fonts, I find they&#8217;re clearer as dark on light, and larger fonts are readable either way, but a dark background = less glare. Likewise, if I&#8217;m reading dark-on-light as small fonts, I prefer the background of the non-text areas to be muted to reduce glare, a bit like the grey sidebars of this page.</p>
<p>Interestingly, the folks at <a href="http://www.blackle.com/" rel="nofollow">Blackle</a> have got themselves a curious idea, but it&#8217;s going to fail. The idea being that it takes more energy to paint white than black on monitors, so if everyone can be convinced to use Google with a black theme, then monitors left on google will use less energy. They quote some research somewhere that shows that across millions of users, the savings are not trivial, but unfortunately what may have been true in the CRT world is patently not true in the LCD world.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chrissy</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6497</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 02:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6497</guid>
					<description>I looked through my portfolio and found I only have one site where I used light text on a dark background (and it was my own).   This was done because it's a photography website, with more photos than text, and I think the photos look better on a black background.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked through my portfolio and found I only have one site where I used light text on a dark background (and it was my own).   This was done because it&#8217;s a photography website, with more photos than text, and I think the photos look better on a black background.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: polarizer</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6496</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6496</guid>
					<description>Light on dark will help if your site affects an arty audience - beside the undaground stuff. Normal people scan websites - give'em - and (you) - a chance to detect the wanted content.

the polarizer

ps: nice site - now in my bookmarks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Light on dark will help if your site affects an arty audience - beside the undaground stuff. Normal people scan websites - give&#8217;em - and (you) - a chance to detect the wanted content.</p>
<p>the polarizer</p>
<p>ps: nice site - now in my bookmarks
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Craig Betts</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6493</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6493</guid>
					<description>Well, you know that I am old school, so I prefer the lighter text on dark background.  I am used to working in dark offices and found this to be a better combo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you know that I am old school, so I prefer the lighter text on dark background.  I am used to working in dark offices and found this to be a better combo.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt`</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6492</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6492</guid>
					<description>Whitespace seems empty, so my eye goes naturally to the text. If the background is blacked out then the page seems fuller/busier and the text is harder to pick out from "the crowd"

I have a friend who used this to make it seem like he had more stuff in a folder full of art-stuff for school - black paper with stuff stuck to it looks more complete than if there are big areas of white left in the gaps.

On the other hand, sometimes if the text is very closely printed I find it easier to read if I highlight it (so it's black on a light grey background) reducing the contrast. Alternatively increasing the font size restores readability. I think that's caused by the text starting to turn into a big black blob on the page because the gaps of empty whiteness aren't enough to properly define the letters. 

Actually, the same applies with white text on black (in which case highlighting reverses the colour balance back to dark on light as well as reducing the contrast a little)

Meh, dark on light generally seems better, I'm going with my intuition on this one (my subconscious knows my eyes better than I do  :wink:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whitespace seems empty, so my eye goes naturally to the text. If the background is blacked out then the page seems fuller/busier and the text is harder to pick out from &#8220;the crowd&#8221;</p>
<p>I have a friend who used this to make it seem like he had more stuff in a folder full of art-stuff for school - black paper with stuff stuck to it looks more complete than if there are big areas of white left in the gaps.</p>
<p>On the other hand, sometimes if the text is very closely printed I find it easier to read if I highlight it (so it&#8217;s black on a light grey background) reducing the contrast. Alternatively increasing the font size restores readability. I think that&#8217;s caused by the text starting to turn into a big black blob on the page because the gaps of empty whiteness aren&#8217;t enough to properly define the letters. </p>
<p>Actually, the same applies with white text on black (in which case highlighting reverses the colour balance back to dark on light as well as reducing the contrast a little)</p>
<p>Meh, dark on light generally seems better, I&#8217;m going with my intuition on this one (my subconscious knows my eyes better than I do   <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt="wink" class="wp-smiley" /> )
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke Maciak</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6488</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6488</guid>
					<description>Btw - I noticed that I light on dark pages are less workplace friendly. Note that most documentation sites, and useful crap that you could use as reference uses the dark on light scheme. The light on dark sites are usually bullshit entertainment crap and as such they draw more attention if for example your boss glances on your screen while passing by. :mrgreen:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw - I noticed that I light on dark pages are less workplace friendly. Note that most documentation sites, and useful crap that you could use as reference uses the dark on light scheme. The light on dark sites are usually bullshit entertainment crap and as such they draw more attention if for example your boss glances on your screen while passing by.  <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif" alt="mrgreen" class="wp-smiley" />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Starhawk</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6486</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/09/is-dark-text-on-light-background-the-superior-choice/#comment-6486</guid>
					<description>I don't care for Light text on a dark background, i find it basically unreadable. It makes my head hurt and my eyes get all blurry esp if I am tired. If it is something i wanna read I will often highlight it or copy and paste it to another application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care for Light text on a dark background, i find it basically unreadable. It makes my head hurt and my eyes get all blurry esp if I am tired. If it is something i wanna read I will often highlight it or copy and paste it to another application.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.533 seconds -->
