<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows: Change Your Default Telnet Handler</title>
	<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/11/21/windows-change-your-default-telnet-handler/</link>
	<description>Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Nathan Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/11/21/windows-change-your-default-telnet-handler/#comment-7080</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/11/21/windows-change-your-default-telnet-handler/#comment-7080</guid>
					<description>Ah, I thought you meant you were sending or receiving mail the hardcore way ;)

netcat and telnet are like the while and do loops of network tools. Very similar, but sometimes one or the other just feels more right. 

Just like nethack, I can see other scenarios where telnet makes sense even if ssh could conceivably do the job. But I'll definitely grant you that I type 'ssh' multiple times per day and 'telnet' maybe once a month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I thought you meant you were sending or receiving mail the hardcore way <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>netcat and telnet are like the while and do loops of network tools. Very similar, but sometimes one or the other just feels more right. </p>
<p>Just like nethack, I can see other scenarios where telnet makes sense even if ssh could conceivably do the job. But I&#8217;ll definitely grant you that I type &#8217;ssh&#8217; multiple times per day and &#8216;telnet&#8217; maybe once a month.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke Maciak</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/11/21/windows-change-your-default-telnet-handler/#comment-7075</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/11/21/windows-change-your-default-telnet-handler/#comment-7075</guid>
					<description>Yup, that's what I meant when I mentioned telneting to port 110 or 25. But you could theoretically use netcat for that with about the same effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, that&#8217;s what I meant when I mentioned telneting to port 110 or 25. But you could theoretically use netcat for that with about the same effect.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nathan Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/11/21/windows-change-your-default-telnet-handler/#comment-7074</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/11/21/windows-change-your-default-telnet-handler/#comment-7074</guid>
					<description>Not exactly an everyday thing, but if you're debugging a server (mailserver, http server, whatever) then telnet is your friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not exactly an everyday thing, but if you&#8217;re debugging a server (mailserver, http server, whatever) then telnet is your friend.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.451 seconds -->
