<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In defense of office suite databases</title>
	<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/12/21/in-defense-of-office-suite-databases/</link>
	<description>Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings...</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Muhammad</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/12/21/in-defense-of-office-suite-databases/#comment-7448</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 14:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/12/21/in-defense-of-office-suite-databases/#comment-7448</guid>
					<description>LoL! Glad you've finally found a use for MS Access! It seems to fill in the niche gap between Excel and Oracle/MySQL/etc.

I think my gf's company (she works for a small youth welfare organization) is also using MS Access for some basic record-keeping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LoL! Glad you&#8217;ve finally found a use for MS Access! It seems to fill in the niche gap between Excel and Oracle/MySQL/etc.</p>
<p>I think my gf&#8217;s company (she works for a small youth welfare organization) is also using MS Access for some basic record-keeping.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke Maciak</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/12/21/in-defense-of-office-suite-databases/#comment-7438</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/12/21/in-defense-of-office-suite-databases/#comment-7438</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;@ZeWrestler&lt;/strong&gt; - well, that's probably one of those borderline things. They would have probably benefited from something better than Access but I guess the fact they actually considered a database counts. ;)

&lt;strong&gt;@Nathan&lt;/strong&gt; - Uh, damn spellcheck. I fixed it. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@ZeWrestler</strong> - well, that&#8217;s probably one of those borderline things. They would have probably benefited from something better than Access but I guess the fact they actually considered a database counts. <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p><strong>@Nathan</strong> - Uh, damn spellcheck. I fixed it. Thanks!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/12/21/in-defense-of-office-suite-databases/#comment-7436</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/12/21/in-defense-of-office-suite-databases/#comment-7436</guid>
					<description>Nitpick: it's perl, not pearl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nitpick: it&#8217;s perl, not pearl.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ZeWrestler</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/12/21/in-defense-of-office-suite-databases/#comment-7435</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/12/21/in-defense-of-office-suite-databases/#comment-7435</guid>
					<description>You know, I think the records in my old boy scout troop were stored in access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I think the records in my old boy scout troop were stored in access.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.414 seconds -->
