<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Value Checkbox with JQuery</title>
	<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/03/24/3-value-checkbox-with-jquery/</link>
	<description>Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings...</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Luke Maciak</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/03/24/3-value-checkbox-with-jquery/#comment-8617</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/03/24/3-value-checkbox-with-jquery/#comment-8617</guid>
					<description>[quote post="2353"]There is a lot to say about code modularity, but if I’m wasting time hunting down a 5 line function, I’m going to be mad.[/quote]

Heh, been there, done that. Bonus points if it's a global function called a() which gets overloaded in 7 different places, and the real function is buried under many levels of dependencies (ie. A imports B which imports C and etc - and a() is conveniently located in Z on the bottom of this linked list).

Spaghetti code FTW. :mrgreen:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/03/24/3-value-checkbox-with-jquery/"><p>
There is a lot to say about code modularity, but if I’m wasting time hunting down a 5 line function, I’m going to be mad.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Heh, been there, done that. Bonus points if it&#8217;s a global function called a() which gets overloaded in 7 different places, and the real function is buried under many levels of dependencies (ie. A imports B which imports C and etc - and a() is conveniently located in Z on the bottom of this linked list).</p>
<p>Spaghetti code FTW.  <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif" alt="mrgreen" class="wp-smiley" />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jambarama</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/03/24/3-value-checkbox-with-jquery/#comment-8582</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/03/24/3-value-checkbox-with-jquery/#comment-8582</guid>
					<description>The second version is more readable.  I've been finding compactness is more and more relevant to readability than I ever thought.  That thought has reduced my commenting by a large amount.  When I'm reading someone else's code (which is most of the time I'm reading code now) and I want to see a function - scrolling, and searching is the worst way.  I just want to read it through like a book, and the more of the code I can see at once, the faster I can read it.  There is a lot to say about code modularity, but if I'm wasting time hunting down a 5 line function, I'm going to be mad.

Excellent work.  If I had written both iterations, I'd be awfully proud of the second block.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second version is more readable.  I&#8217;ve been finding compactness is more and more relevant to readability than I ever thought.  That thought has reduced my commenting by a large amount.  When I&#8217;m reading someone else&#8217;s code (which is most of the time I&#8217;m reading code now) and I want to see a function - scrolling, and searching is the worst way.  I just want to read it through like a book, and the more of the code I can see at once, the faster I can read it.  There is a lot to say about code modularity, but if I&#8217;m wasting time hunting down a 5 line function, I&#8217;m going to be mad.</p>
<p>Excellent work.  If I had written both iterations, I&#8217;d be awfully proud of the second block.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.899 seconds -->
