<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cylons don&#8217;t use Encryption</title>
	<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/04/24/cylons-dont-use-encryption/</link>
	<description>Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Teague</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/04/24/cylons-dont-use-encryption/#comment-8915</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/04/24/cylons-dont-use-encryption/#comment-8915</guid>
					<description>Of course, that should be &lt;strong&gt;synchronized&lt;/strong&gt;....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, that should be <strong>synchronized</strong>&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Teague</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/04/24/cylons-dont-use-encryption/#comment-8914</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/04/24/cylons-dont-use-encryption/#comment-8914</guid>
					<description>It's a combination of syncronized frequency hopping by the radios, and a published book of "codes". We were trained in effective use and quick disposal of both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a combination of syncronized frequency hopping by the radios, and a published book of &#8220;codes&#8221;. We were trained in effective use and quick disposal of both.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke Maciak</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/04/24/cylons-dont-use-encryption/#comment-8911</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/04/24/cylons-dont-use-encryption/#comment-8911</guid>
					<description>See people - there you go. :)

&lt;strong&gt;@Teague&lt;/strong&gt; - if you don't mind me asking, what kind of "low fi" encryption algorithm would military employ in a situation like the above? I man, if it's not classified that is. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See people - there you go. <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p><strong>@Teague</strong> - if you don&#8217;t mind me asking, what kind of &#8220;low fi&#8221; encryption algorithm would military employ in a situation like the above? I man, if it&#8217;s not classified that is. <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Teague</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/04/24/cylons-dont-use-encryption/#comment-8909</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/04/24/cylons-dont-use-encryption/#comment-8909</guid>
					<description>As a veteran of the US Army, I can confirm that security of transmissions is held to be of the utmost importance, and every recruit is trained accordingly. Security in general, and communications, specifically, is at the top of my list of things I know I will almost always have to suspend my disbelief about when watching shows with military aspects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a veteran of the US Army, I can confirm that security of transmissions is held to be of the utmost importance, and every recruit is trained accordingly. Security in general, and communications, specifically, is at the top of my list of things I know I will almost always have to suspend my disbelief about when watching shows with military aspects.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke Maciak</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/04/24/cylons-dont-use-encryption/#comment-8893</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 05:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/04/24/cylons-dont-use-encryption/#comment-8893</guid>
					<description>Yep, the problem is generating truly random data, and protecting it from getting captured or intercepted. This is why it is not really used in electronic encryption that much. For manual encryption though there are few better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, the problem is generating truly random data, and protecting it from getting captured or intercepted. This is why it is not really used in electronic encryption that much. For manual encryption though there are few better.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ths</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/04/24/cylons-dont-use-encryption/#comment-8889</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/04/24/cylons-dont-use-encryption/#comment-8889</guid>
					<description>the OTP is *proven* unbreakable (the only one where it can be proven, see Schneier's Advanced Cryptography book or any other student book on elementary crypto) if the chiffre is truly random and at least as long as the message you want to encrypt. there is no attack vector to reduce complexity even if the operation is a simple 1:1 XOR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the OTP is *proven* unbreakable (the only one where it can be proven, see Schneier&#8217;s Advanced Cryptography book or any other student book on elementary crypto) if the chiffre is truly random and at least as long as the message you want to encrypt. there is no attack vector to reduce complexity even if the operation is a simple 1:1 XOR.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.731 seconds -->
