<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</title>
	<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/</link>
	<description>Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Terminally Incoherent &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Live Free or Die Stupid (aka Die Hard 4)</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-10134</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-10134</guid>
					<description>[...] It seems that there is some sort of pissing contest going on in Hollywood to see who can make a movie with more outrageous stunts. This trend peeked and culminated in the proverbial Nuking of the Fridge in Indiana Jones 4. Die Hard 4 is a clear runner up in the same league though. McClain destroys a helicopter by driving over a fire hydrant, blows up another driving a car up a makeshift ramp into it, outmaneuvers and destroys a Harrier jet while driving a tractor trailer. Of course before he destroys the jet he jumps on top of it, and manages to stand upright on one of the wings while the plane spins out of control. I mean, WTF is this? Jet surfing? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] It seems that there is some sort of pissing contest going on in Hollywood to see who can make a movie with more outrageous stunts. This trend peeked and culminated in the proverbial Nuking of the Fridge in Indiana Jones 4. Die Hard 4 is a clear runner up in the same league though. McClain destroys a helicopter by driving over a fire hydrant, blows up another driving a car up a makeshift ramp into it, outmaneuvers and destroys a Harrier jet while driving a tractor trailer. Of course before he destroys the jet he jumps on top of it, and manages to stand upright on one of the wings while the plane spins out of control. I mean, WTF is this? Jet surfing? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke Maciak</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9306</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9306</guid>
					<description>LOL! Nuke the fridge! Brilliant! I will be sure to use it in movie reviews from now on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL! Nuke the fridge! Brilliant! I will be sure to use it in movie reviews from now on!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jambarama</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9305</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9305</guid>
					<description>Looks like the movie has spawned a new phrase: &lt;a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=nuke+the+fridge" rel="nofollow"&gt; "nuke the fridge"&lt;/a&gt;.  As in, &lt;i&gt;"Star Wars didn't really nuke the fridge until Jar Jar Binks was introduced."&lt;/i&gt; It is the movie version of &lt;a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=jump+the+shark" rel="nofollow"&gt; jumping the shark&lt;/a&gt;.  Ouch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the movie has spawned a new phrase: <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=nuke+the+fridge" rel="nofollow"> &#8220;nuke the fridge&#8221;</a>.  As in, <i>&#8220;Star Wars didn&#8217;t really nuke the fridge until Jar Jar Binks was introduced.&#8221;</i> It is the movie version of <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=jump+the+shark" rel="nofollow"> jumping the shark</a>.  Ouch.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Biggamer</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9297</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9297</guid>
					<description>Nice man, I'll make sure to catch it in the cinemas... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice man, I&#8217;ll make sure to catch it in the cinemas&#8230; <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phylevn</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9291</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 22:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9291</guid>
					<description>I think that the movie was funny.. Althoug the movie confused the prehispanic civilizations in America.. for example the Incas in Peru not is the same that the Aztecas in the center of Mexico or Mayas in the mexican caribbean .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the movie was funny.. Althoug the movie confused the prehispanic civilizations in America.. for example the Incas in Peru not is the same that the Aztecas in the center of Mexico or Mayas in the mexican caribbean .
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Travis McCrea</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9240</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9240</guid>
					<description>because they are forced to be innovative... of course</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because they are forced to be innovative&#8230; of course
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke Maciak</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9239</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9239</guid>
					<description>[quote post="2486"]Sometimes less is more…[/quote]

You said it. It's funny how most good movies have somewhat limited budgets, and the multi-million dollar productions are usually really bad. Why is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/"><p>
Sometimes less is more…</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You said it. It&#8217;s funny how most good movies have somewhat limited budgets, and the multi-million dollar productions are usually really bad. Why is that?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: e</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9234</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9234</guid>
					<description>OK, definitely will wait till this comes out on video. Thanks for the thorough and extremely entertaining review. When I read it, I couldn't stop laughing (and I was in a seminar so it was really hard to hide that I wasn't paying attention to the speaker!). I can't believe that practically every hollywood cliché was woven intertextually into the script. Sometimes less is more...
I wonder if this was Lucas' test to see whether his &#38; Ford's loyal fan base would come out and make them a few more bucks. I think another comment had it right...you would like to suspend your beliefs, even if only for the briefest and most innocuous reason.
If you want to see a movie where prairie dogs do sing, watch James Gandolfini in &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0368222/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Romance &#38; Cigarettes&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, definitely will wait till this comes out on video. Thanks for the thorough and extremely entertaining review. When I read it, I couldn&#8217;t stop laughing (and I was in a seminar so it was really hard to hide that I wasn&#8217;t paying attention to the speaker!). I can&#8217;t believe that practically every hollywood cliché was woven intertextually into the script. Sometimes less is more&#8230;<br />
I wonder if this was Lucas&#8217; test to see whether his &amp; Ford&#8217;s loyal fan base would come out and make them a few more bucks. I think another comment had it right&#8230;you would like to suspend your beliefs, even if only for the briefest and most innocuous reason.<br />
If you want to see a movie where prairie dogs do sing, watch James Gandolfini in <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0368222/" rel="nofollow">Romance &amp; Cigarettes</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke Maciak</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9226</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9226</guid>
					<description>[quote post="2486"]Perhaps Lucas is aiming for the dizzying accolades given to Uwe Boll?[/quote]

Ah, but the difference is that Uwe makes horrible movies on purpose. He is funding them in Germany via private investors. The German law then allows him to write off 100% of the investment as a tax deduction, but only if the movie losses money. Boll probably gets to pocket the change and creates a safe way to move large amounts of money for his investors. It's all shady as hell. Oh, and notice how he is primarily interested in popular video game franchises - and he always secures the rights to future adaptations. Meaning that if someone wants to make a real adaptation at a later time, or if the game company wants to take back the movie rights he can sell at premium. :P

George Lucas is a different case though. He actually produced few good movies, but then at some point he forgot how to do it. It seems that the bigger the budget he has, the worse movie he produces. 

[quote post="2486"]Chuck Norris is now a columnist[/quote]

Chuck Norris doesn't write columns. He roundhouse kicks the keyboard and a well thought out article is automatically sent to his publisher.

[quote post="2486"]I think a lot of people are holding it up to their childhood memories of how cool the earlier ones were when they were kids.[/quote]

Well, I watched these movies many, many times. The way I felt about them as a kid, changed on subsequent viewings. The point was that while the early Lucas movies did have spectacular (for that time) special effects, they also had an engaging story, and this sense of mystery, and adventure. The had that specific feel to them that made us all fall in love with them. 

The new installments don't have that. There are complete departures from the old model, re-made to suit whatever the fuck Lucas things is cool these days. 

Oh, and there is another strange pattern here - he always seems to lose it around the third movie and then it all goes downhill from there.

[quote post="2486"]What was the last movie you saw that you would call great? Or even good? [/quote]

I saw Memento the other day. It was good. Not perfect, but good. There are good movies out there. So it's not like Hollywood is churning out total shit all the time. But it seems that all the major blockbusters with big budgets are turning out horrible these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/"><p>
Perhaps Lucas is aiming for the dizzying accolades given to Uwe Boll?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ah, but the difference is that Uwe makes horrible movies on purpose. He is funding them in Germany via private investors. The German law then allows him to write off 100% of the investment as a tax deduction, but only if the movie losses money. Boll probably gets to pocket the change and creates a safe way to move large amounts of money for his investors. It&#8217;s all shady as hell. Oh, and notice how he is primarily interested in popular video game franchises - and he always secures the rights to future adaptations. Meaning that if someone wants to make a real adaptation at a later time, or if the game company wants to take back the movie rights he can sell at premium. <img src="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif" alt="P" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>George Lucas is a different case though. He actually produced few good movies, but then at some point he forgot how to do it. It seems that the bigger the budget he has, the worse movie he produces. </p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/"><p>
Chuck Norris is now a columnist</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Chuck Norris doesn&#8217;t write columns. He roundhouse kicks the keyboard and a well thought out article is automatically sent to his publisher.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/"><p>
I think a lot of people are holding it up to their childhood memories of how cool the earlier ones were when they were kids.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, I watched these movies many, many times. The way I felt about them as a kid, changed on subsequent viewings. The point was that while the early Lucas movies did have spectacular (for that time) special effects, they also had an engaging story, and this sense of mystery, and adventure. The had that specific feel to them that made us all fall in love with them. </p>
<p>The new installments don&#8217;t have that. There are complete departures from the old model, re-made to suit whatever the fuck Lucas things is cool these days. </p>
<p>Oh, and there is another strange pattern here - he always seems to lose it around the third movie and then it all goes downhill from there.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/"><p>
What was the last movie you saw that you would call great? Or even good? </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I saw Memento the other day. It was good. Not perfect, but good. There are good movies out there. So it&#8217;s not like Hollywood is churning out total shit all the time. But it seems that all the major blockbusters with big budgets are turning out horrible these days.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9224</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/06/02/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comment-9224</guid>
					<description>I didn't think it was that bad, really, but I can see your points. The prairie dogs were probably the silliest bit in the film aside from the refrigerator of course. I quite enjoyed the movie, actually, but only probably because I liked the first ones, plus I have a huge crush on Harrison Ford even though he's totally too old to be doing this shit. I also like movies that don't really require too much brain power to enjoy. God, what does that say about me???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think it was that bad, really, but I can see your points. The prairie dogs were probably the silliest bit in the film aside from the refrigerator of course. I quite enjoyed the movie, actually, but only probably because I liked the first ones, plus I have a huge crush on Harrison Ford even though he&#8217;s totally too old to be doing this shit. I also like movies that don&#8217;t really require too much brain power to enjoy. God, what does that say about me???
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.093 seconds -->
