<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is the point of explicit typing again?</title>
	<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/07/07/what-is-the-point-of-explicit-typing-again/</link>
	<description>Utterly random, incoherent and disjointed rants and ramblings...</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Adam Kahtava</title>
		<link>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/07/07/what-is-the-point-of-explicit-typing-again/#comment-9570</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2008/07/07/what-is-the-point-of-explicit-typing-again/#comment-9570</guid>
					<description>The Implicit Typed declarations, Lambdas, Anonymous Types, Object/Collection Initializers are a step forward, but... I wish the Implicit Typed declarations weren't bound to local scope, and was hoping that these changes were more than syntactical sugar - under the hood the CLR still emits the same old MSIL. Maybe in the next release we'll see more dynamism, but I guess that's what the DLR will be for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Implicit Typed declarations, Lambdas, Anonymous Types, Object/Collection Initializers are a step forward, but&#8230; I wish the Implicit Typed declarations weren&#8217;t bound to local scope, and was hoping that these changes were more than syntactical sugar - under the hood the CLR still emits the same old MSIL. Maybe in the next release we&#8217;ll see more dynamism, but I guess that&#8217;s what the DLR will be for.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.328 seconds -->
