Comments on: Coding without an IDE is like eating soup with a fork http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/02/20/coding-without-an-ide-is-like-eating-soup-with-a-fork/ I will not fix your computer. Tue, 04 Aug 2020 22:34:33 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.26 By: JuEeHa http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/02/20/coding-without-an-ide-is-like-eating-soup-with-a-fork/#comment-21451 Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:23:23 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=430#comment-21451

Actually I have changed my opinion a bit after I tried Python IDLE. There should be more IDEs like it. It is only type of IDE I (can stand|like). At the moment of writing this message I am writing a webbrowser on python using urllib, smgllib and Tkinter and IDLE is just so fun to work with, but I still dislike “normal” IDEs.

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: JuEeHa http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/02/20/coding-without-an-ide-is-like-eating-soup-with-a-fork/#comment-21386 Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:34:25 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=430#comment-21386

For me coding *with* an IDE is like eating soup with a fork. On linux I always use Kate text editor with little terminal window running two shells(compile/link shell and test shell) on gnu screen. On OS X I tried Xcode but it had too much clutter and now I use Xterm running on X11.app with wwm and inside Xterm is running a gnu screen with 1-5 editor windows, make/compile/link shell and test shell. (I am also very sad that I can’t post using lynx)

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: Chris Wellons http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/02/20/coding-without-an-ide-is-like-eating-soup-with-a-fork/#comment-12091 Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:56:10 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=430#comment-12091

I see “automatically rename my file and refactor all references in the code when I change the name of the class” as an annoyance, not a feature. I want complete control of my work. You only need a big IDE with Java because you have to move giant mountains of code around, thanks to Java’s excessive verbosity.

I’ll stick with Emacs. :-P

Reply  |  Quote
]]>