Comments on: We should coin a name for non-geeks http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2009/05/18/we-should-coin-a-name-for-non-geeks/ I will not fix your computer. Tue, 04 Aug 2020 22:34:33 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.26 By: Natrinicle http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2009/05/18/we-should-coin-a-name-for-non-geeks/#comment-63120 Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:10:47 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=3107#comment-63120

I tend to refer to them as luddites simply due to the fact that they seem not to want to learn as far as they can get away with it.

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: sheezheer http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2009/05/18/we-should-coin-a-name-for-non-geeks/#comment-24303 Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:22:33 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=3107#comment-24303

dweeb… my kids would say it dates me. muggle… my kids know they’re ordinary. how about using what we do best and use “NAG”… Nnot Aa Ggeek. Don’t they do a lot of complaining (nagging)? After all, why do we use those pesky little nag screens that annoy the enlightened and inform the user illiterates? LOL

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: Aspiring Geek http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2009/05/18/we-should-coin-a-name-for-non-geeks/#comment-20229 Thu, 08 Sep 2011 04:42:03 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=3107#comment-20229

I think that if the term originally started using for us was meant to be derogatory the term we use should be derogatory, but not to the degree where it is offensive. Someone referred to the term “Dweeb;” I have to side with him because it is a term that already exists that has slight negative connotations, so the only thing to do would be to make the use of it common enough that we can narrow the definition down (similar to what happened with the term “geek” which used to be a more generic insult rather than just referring to a sub-cultural similar interest group). Streamers sounds like a compliment to me, so I am slightly opposed just on principal (no offence Luke as you probably put quit a bit of thought into it; I have quite enjoyed reading your posts, and decided to comment on this one because it seemed relevant to my life).

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: Mack http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2009/05/18/we-should-coin-a-name-for-non-geeks/#comment-12364 Thu, 21 May 2009 12:59:47 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=3107#comment-12364

It appears you’ve written this article under the misconception that if you’re not a geek, you’re mainstream, and vice versa, without really giving any consideration to any other cultural groups built around a shared skill or idea (Although, admittedly they are few and far between nowdays) that reject or are distinctive from mainstream culture.

I think the old cop abbeviation NORP is plausible as a phrase only it doesn’t quite work because NORPs don’t necessarily buy into mainstream culture.

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: sam http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2009/05/18/we-should-coin-a-name-for-non-geeks/#comment-12363 Thu, 21 May 2009 08:56:17 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=3107#comment-12363

IMO Streamers, although appropriate, sounds like something positive, and we shouldn’t reward technical ignorance with a positive name. It should be slightly derogatory – or it’s no fun to call anyone one.

Norm
Mundo
Gumby
Gonk
Bogon
Spod
Peon
Droid
Trog
Tourist
Weeble
Zombie
Waldo

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: Ian Clifton http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2009/05/18/we-should-coin-a-name-for-non-geeks/#comment-12360 Wed, 20 May 2009 19:48:14 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=3107#comment-12360

They’re just passive luddites… or maybe lazy luddites… el-els ;) They’ll probably think you’re calling them LL Cool J or something and be happy about it.

So far I like tentees the most.

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: Todd http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2009/05/18/we-should-coin-a-name-for-non-geeks/#comment-12359 Wed, 20 May 2009 14:13:36 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=3107#comment-12359

We have always called them technotards. In fact, one of our technotards actually came up with the name.

Todd

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: Travis McCrea http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2009/05/18/we-should-coin-a-name-for-non-geeks/#comment-12358 Wed, 20 May 2009 06:43:03 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=3107#comment-12358

@Luke Maciak:
:) Terminally Incoherent – Letting out your “other” maturity levels since 2003!

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: Luke Maciak http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2009/05/18/we-should-coin-a-name-for-non-geeks/#comment-12356 Wed, 20 May 2009 04:57:18 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=3107#comment-12356

@eet: True, at least they will understand “Muggle”. Well, either that, or they will consider us Harry Potter fanatic. I rather be a regular geek, than be mistaken for a Harry Potter geek. :)

@Travis McCrea: LOL. The first time around I read it as “poopies” :P

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: Travis McCrea http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2009/05/18/we-should-coin-a-name-for-non-geeks/#comment-12355 Wed, 20 May 2009 04:46:28 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=3107#comment-12355

@Travis McCrea: Or those who follow pop culture, etc.

I hate the unchecked followup button btw :)

Reply  |  Quote
]]>