I recently got my hands on an old HP proliant, my first real server. Since I’m thick and have limited time to ‘play’ I went with what I know… Ubuntu. I guess it’s just because I know my way around it a little better than anything else. And it seems to work fine. I don’t really use the server for anything except playing – but I suppose it’s more of a learning tool that anything else.

Arch. I’ve tried many and have settled on arch for its great user community.

I prefer Cent for servers primarily for two reasons: SELinux, and it’s what I grew up on (redhat academy). Fedora was my first distro, and I enjoy a kernel level security option that’s useful for something other than protecting CUPS (yes, I’m talking about you, Ubuntu). Sure, Ubuntu’s AppArmour and user policies work great at protecting most systems, and sure, SELinux can be a PAIN sometimes, but the new reporting tools in Fedora, which should make their way into Redhat/Cent sometime soon, make it very simple to create an SELinux policy. There’s a little more work in setting up sudo and making root underprivledged less accessable but I fell much better using kernel-level security.

Guess no one here is an Exchange administrator. I use Windows 2008 R2 for the last while. Basically because of Exchange.

I have a love hate thing going with gentoo. Love since you can upgrade packages easily without having to re-install the base image. Which means that when python 2.7 comes around, you don’t have to reinstall the whole system to use it. The only challenge is that you end up with the occasional install dependency hell where you need a piece of software but it’s not ready yet.

This is for my personal box, for a work box I would probably default to a non-stable unbuntu to insure current packages and run it on an AWS where I could just push the handfull of packages that are custom to our environment.

First choice for base system is Debian, but sometimes I had to add own (versions) of packages from own repository (adjusted version, some compilation options etc.). A few times it was required or easier to use server version of Ubuntu instead.

BTW you can tell network team it’s Debian k/FreeBSD (yes, this is official Debian version). Let us know their response. ;-)

I prefer Debian in most cases, simply because of its huge selection of packages and their accessibility through apt-get. Of the BSDs, my preferred flavor is actually OpenBSD. They emphasize security — to the detriment of other things, honestly — over the OS and a nice subset of userland. Debian has some embarrassing security mistakes in their past, so if I really need a hardened system, and performance isn’t an issue, I’ll go with OpenBSD instead.

Hmm this is a toughy. I work at the Library of Congress and we have a Solaris and AIX running here. I hate both of them but Solaris does have some neat things going for it. (Besides, I hate it mostly because it is such a huge pain to install Emacs on it.) For personal servers I mostly use Gentoo because it’s really flexible and I’ve used it before.

One of the things I’ve noticed is that the things which make a good server aren’t the same things which make a good desktop. I use Arch on my desktop for instance because I like the rolling release strategy for instance. But rolling release the Arch style is horrible for a server where you need stability. Gentoo is also rolling release but at least you can pin down packages to specific versions and update things asynchronously or not at all. On a server it kind of makes sense to just install everything manually and limit your packages to just what you need. Slackware or a BSD kind of fits this bill well.

So I’m not sure what I’d use in the future.

It depends on the system specs. I prefer using Slackware for servers, but if I’m working with old equipment where compiling things myself would take more time than it is worth I run Debian because there are reliable packages for just about everything in the repos.

I use Debian everywhere I can (server, desktop, laptop…), but I’ve tried FreeBSD in the past. It’s still a Unix and it has all the nice software I use (Vim, zsh, etc), but on the other hand I found the ports annoying compared to aptitude. To be frank I didn’t use it long enough to grok the system, so I can’t say much about it.

I have an hosting account at NearlyFreeSpeech which uses FreeBSD for everything, so a few weeks ago I installed it on a VM so I could build Golang binaries for it (NFS lets you run your own CGI apps), but I gave up when I realized it would be easier to simply cross-compile.

For sure, it’s a smaller target considering Ubuntu’s popularity.

I’m not quite sure of that. I mean, Ubuntu is mostly popular on the desktop, where its affected by different vulnerabilities than on a server. On the other hand, Linux is still Linux, and what affects RedHat, Debian, etc will probably affect Ubuntu too, so considering that the target is still bigger.
Kind of hard to know.