Comments on: Putting your Vim files under version control http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2012/03/12/putting-your-vim-files-under-version-control/ I will not fix your computer. Tue, 04 Aug 2020 22:34:33 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.26 By: A list of things you may possibly need, but maybe not (2013 edition) | Terminally Incoherent http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2012/03/12/putting-your-vim-files-under-version-control/#comment-60729 Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:06:58 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=11482#comment-60729

[…] things like installing, upgrading and deleting them up to me. I actually wrote a lengthy post on how I set up my environment so there is no point repeating it here. I admit that it is not the simplest way of doing things. […]

]]>
By: Edgar Veiga http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2012/03/12/putting-your-vim-files-under-version-control/#comment-22316 Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:57:31 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=11482#comment-22316

Nice post :)

When adding && pulling git submodules you should do it recursively! Try this instead of your solution:

git submodule update –init –recursive

Best Regards!

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: STop http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2012/03/12/putting-your-vim-files-under-version-control/#comment-21688 Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:08:16 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=11482#comment-21688

Luke Maciak wrote:

@ STop:
In fact, if you rename _vimrc to .vimrc on windows, it will still work.

Wow! Didn’t know that…

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: Luke Maciak http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2012/03/12/putting-your-vim-files-under-version-control/#comment-21687 Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:58:57 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=11482#comment-21687

@ STop:

:D

STop wrote:

What I don’t really get, is why Moolenaar changed the dot-file thing on other platforms. AFAIK, most other *nix apps that have been ported to mainstream platforms, do fine with dot-files and directories.

Me neither. I guess the problem is that explorer.exe won’t let you create a file or folder name that starts with a dot. I guess this was the impetus behind the change. But yeah, it makes little to no sense once you realize that as long as you don’t use explorer to create these files/folders (use cmd.exe, cygwin, git bash, your own homegrown code in any language) they will work just fine.

In fact, if you rename _vimrc to .vimrc on windows, it will still work.

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: STop http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2012/03/12/putting-your-vim-files-under-version-control/#comment-21686 Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:52:49 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=11482#comment-21686

I’m slowly getting the hang of vim (your fault!)… I may try this sometime…

What I don’t really get, is why Moolenaar changed the dot-file thing on other platforms. AFAIK, most other *nix apps that have been ported to mainstream platforms, do fine with dot-files and directories. Furthermore, most Windows-centric editors (like notepad++) handle dot-files with no issues, so why?

As a footnote: I have been using symlinks for ages to “synchronize” configs and data on dual-boot desktops (usually Linux-Windows). It works fine with Firefox, Thunderbird, Google Earth and Dropbox, among others. Of course, git would bring it to another level…

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: Luke Maciak http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2012/03/12/putting-your-vim-files-under-version-control/#comment-21669 Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:21:30 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=11482#comment-21669

karthik wrote:

I think if I ever lost my .emacs I wouldn’t be able to do anything on Emacs

This is actually something I hear quite often. Apparently there no one true Emacs – there are just millions of hyper-customized Emacs environments tailored to people’s specific needs. :) I think Steve Yegge once wrote like a 50 page blog post on this topic.

@ karthik:

Yeah, Chris does some very interesting stuff on his blog. I love the embedded video instead of a picture thing. Very subtle but freaky effect.

@ astine:

Make sure you at least back them up. :)

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: astine http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2012/03/12/putting-your-vim-files-under-version-control/#comment-21659 Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:08:18 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=11482#comment-21659

I need to someday organize my emacs files. It’s on my todo list, but behind lots of other worthy causes.

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: karthik http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2012/03/12/putting-your-vim-files-under-version-control/#comment-21657 Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:52:10 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=11482#comment-21657

@ Chris Wellons: You have a *very* interesting website! Subscribed.

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: Chris Wellons http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2012/03/12/putting-your-vim-files-under-version-control/#comment-21656 Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:45:40 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=11482#comment-21656

As karthik said, very similarly we Emacs users have ~/.emacs.d/ as a convenient repository root, with init.el replacing ~/.emacs. That’s exactly what I have checked into Git here,

https://github.com/skeeto/.emacs.d

One of the first things I do on any new computer is clone that. After manually setting HOME, this also works properly in Windows.

Reply  |  Quote
]]>
By: Andrew Zimmerman http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2012/03/12/putting-your-vim-files-under-version-control/#comment-21654 Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:01:28 +0000 http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/?p=11482#comment-21654

What about Windows? Windows sucks.

Indeed.. Indeed…

Reply  |  Quote
]]>