According to the latest study posted on slashdot, pr0n constitutes only 1% of the available, searchable Internet content. I am totally stumped!
Here we all thought that the internet is for porn, but it turns out that it is not! Holly friken doodles!
This is actually a really, really good ratio of smut to content if you ask me. Which leads me to this:
All you COPA pushers, please STFU!
All you idiots crying “Save the Children!”, STFU!
All you pompous, religious, pr0n hating zealots, STFU!
Everyone who thought that .xxx was a good idea, STFU!
Everyone who ever supported any kind of Internet censorship, STFU!
STFU and die! You people are dumb, hypocritical sex deviants!
Sorry – it had to be done. All those jerkoffs that get on their high horse claim they don’t watch pr0n piss me off. If you are to dumb to get free smut on the web, to perverted to be turned on by the sickest shit that the net has to offer, or to wrapped up in your stupid religion to even think about sex, it does not mean you have right to regulate our masturbatory activities… Er… I mean, our entertainment.
Anyways, pr0n is not the problem – it’s just a minuscule 1% of the information available out there. I know that it seems more but that’s because you probably spend to much time downloading it and searching for it. :P
Btw, if you RTFM you will see that this study is probably not the most accurate, revealing or thorough one. So yeah – grain of salt, people. I just never miss an occasion to insult the pr0n hating prudes.
[tags]pr0n, porn, pornography, internet, censorship, content, copa[/tags]
I don’t think porn is the problem, but the sexual predators luring children on myspace, online journals, and all other meeting places on the internet. It’s understandable, yet crazy, how many times on the news they are talking about a sexual predator on myspace. What did people think they were going to go on myspace for, network with other sexual predators??
Sexual predators wouldn’t be a problem, either, if people would educate their children enough to know that they shouldn’t put their home address, phone number, or other personal information on the internet. If kids knew better than to give away information, or to meet people they didn’t know, than sexual predators would still be guys in van’s with tinted windows and candy, not CuteGuy89@myspace.com.
(That’s not a real email, mind you, just an example. Sorry, cuteguy89@myspace.com, if you really exist. I’m sure you’re a real swell guy.)
Yeah. The fact is that there should be no underage kids on myspace at all. The fact that kids are able to set up accounts, and interact with total strangers without any supervision is a failure in the parenting department.